X-Varnish-Cacheable
HTTP response headerHeader usage statistics
X-Varnish-Cacheable response header information and usage statistics.| Websites using header X-Varnish-Cacheable | 1,116 |
| Percentage of websites that use X-Varnish-Cacheable header | <0.1% |
| Total discovered header values | 27 |
| Header uses directives | No |
| Header values are unique or random | No |
| Most popular in the country | 
United States of America
|
Distribution by websites popularity
X-Varnish-Cacheable detection in the top websites by popularity| Top 10k sites | 1 websites |
| Top 100k sites | 27 websites |
| Top 1m sites | 128 websites |
Websites utilizing X-Varnish-Cacheable
List of websites that use X-Varnish-Cacheable header| Domain | Country | Rank | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
United States of America
|
4,634 | |
|
|
Germany
|
13,504 | |
|
|
Germany
|
13,504 | |
|
|
United States of America
|
14,817 | |
|
|
Argentina
|
16,562 | |
|
|
Argentina
|
16,562 |
Flat price per the report, subscription is not required.
Geographical Distribution
Header usage distribution by websites across the globe.Common header values
List of top common X-Varnish-Cacheable header values| Header value | Value prevalence |
|---|---|
| YES | 83.69% |
| NO:Not Cacheable | 8.51% |
| NO: Not Cacheable | 7.08% |
| vary | 5.02% |
| NO: Geolocation | 3.67% |
| cookieless | 3.05% |
| YES:Cacheable | 1.88% |
| NO:ttl=0.000 | 1.16% |
| YES/TTL 300.000 | 0.81% |
| NO/TTL 0 | 0.81% |
| false | 0.72% |
| YES/error | 0.54% |
| NO | 0.27% |
| NO (no-cache) | 0.27% |
| NO (TTL) | 0.27% |
| NO:301 or 302 | 0.27% |
| 1 | 0.18% |
| YES/TTL 31536000.000 | 0.18% |
| NO, reason: ttl from backend <=0 | 0.18% |
| never | 0.09% |